boldlygoing
19th May 2004, 04:57 AM
Hi Mark, et al,
Has anyone had the experience of using Post Affiliate (free or Pro) with any of the nuke based content management systems? If so, did you actually fully port PAP(or free) into the CMS's data bases or just link out to it.
Basically, we are curious as to what the curve would be like to truly integrate this application completely into the CMS we use (CPG-Nuke).
Like many of the visitors here, and many more out there, I have either used or evaluated "many" of the affiliate program options out there for web site owners. While I haven't "used" this one, everything I am reading here tells me that it might not only be the right one, but worth paying for the pro version. We might like to see a longer guarantee period, especially considering that we (like a lot of folks) don't currently have affiliate users that we could immediately populate into the system to adequately test it. I would think that 30 days might be long enough to only get it set up, and truly/fully integrated into ones site. My guess is that at least a 90 day period would be better evaluation time to really work at allowing it to get more fully populated.
Just my thoughts. We do like what we see.
Thanks much.
Has anyone had the experience of using Post Affiliate (free or Pro) with any of the nuke based content management systems? If so, did you actually fully port PAP(or free) into the CMS's data bases or just link out to it.
Basically, we are curious as to what the curve would be like to truly integrate this application completely into the CMS we use (CPG-Nuke).
Like many of the visitors here, and many more out there, I have either used or evaluated "many" of the affiliate program options out there for web site owners. While I haven't "used" this one, everything I am reading here tells me that it might not only be the right one, but worth paying for the pro version. We might like to see a longer guarantee period, especially considering that we (like a lot of folks) don't currently have affiliate users that we could immediately populate into the system to adequately test it. I would think that 30 days might be long enough to only get it set up, and truly/fully integrated into ones site. My guess is that at least a 90 day period would be better evaluation time to really work at allowing it to get more fully populated.
Just my thoughts. We do like what we see.
Thanks much.